Ajay Devgn: “People need to know of our history, which has not been depicted a lot.”

Ajay Devgn

LIPIKA VARMA , in conversation with AJAY DEVGN, on Bhuj, the rise of OTT, and how he believes films are apt mediums to depart historical knowledge.

Actor, film director and producer Ajay Devgn has to his credit over one hundred films alongside not just one, but two National Awards to his name. His last theatrical release, Tanhaji: The Unsung Warrior, was a successful biographical film. It comes as no surprise to his viewers then that, with his next release, Devgn continues to push the envelope. Bhuj: The Pride of India is set during the Indo-Pakistan war of 1971. The film charts the life of Squadron Leader Vijay Karnik, then in charge of Bhuj airport. As has been seen with other films over the past year, Bhuj is now streaming on the OTT platform Disney+Hotstar.

On Bhuj, biopics, and historical lineage

After your last film Tanhaji, you seem to be doing another biopic with Bhuj. Is it a conscious decision? How realistic is this one?

Be real to the character; don’t make it too filmy. Whatever you have seen, it’s very real. When any person is fighting for his country, he is not showing off. It comes naturally from within. So, a film needs to be made true to its craft and should be based on reality. We have shown it to Army and Air Force personnel, and they are happy about it.

Be real to the character; don’t make it too filmy

Bhuj was slated for theatrical release but is now an OTT venture. What do you think of the tussle between theatrical release and the OTT platform?

There is no certainty that the third wave will not happen. While we have been facing losses as theatres have been shut, they will be made up for. Whenever theatres open, even across the world, people will go to watch films. We recently saw our film on the big screen for colour corrections. It was altogether a different experience. OTT is a very good chance for the industry. Most filmmakers from the industry keep arguing for theatre. Theatres will open and we producers will strike a good balance as films will still be seen in theatres. Many films can still be watched on OTT. Bhuj will be seen on OTT; it is a growth for the industry.

How important is it for the recent generation to know about India’s unsung heroes and more of our history?

 People need to know of our history, which has not been depicted a lot. The British tried to push our history under the carpet so that the sacrifices of our true heroes wouldn’t come to the forefront. There is not much written about the unsung heroes in the school textbooks either. Tanhaji’s bravery had a mention of half a page when we went to school, and this has disappeared now. We should talk about it. This generation does not know of all who fought and sacrificed their lives to get us freedom from the clutches of the British. When you understand the difficulty that has gone to achieve independence, you will come together. Real people have worked selflessly, and their sacrifices need to be remembered.

What do actors want? They want to be seen to the maximum.

An Insider’s Insight on the Industry

Do you agree that a big producer’s muscle power will fetch him more theatres?

All of us, including you guys, are aware of this fact. When you make a film, you want your product to go all over, and you are looking at the best release. It’s not about muscle power. It’s not that we are trying to create a loss for others, but we are trying to get maximum theatres to be able to show our product to many more people. There is nothing wrong with it. Woh ladaayi toh chalti rahegi [That fight will go on]. Many people are involved in the filmmaking process and so much money is spent. You will try your best that the product reaches the right place. Whether you are at loss, or the others are at loss…this happens in all the industries. We have no choice. Theatres are less compared to the number of films made every year, so this fight will continue.

You have debuted on OTT with Rudra. What difference did you find? What are do your future plans look like?

We are currently working on an OTT project and are planning a film. The idea of telling historical and biographical stories is merely for people to know about their sacrifices. We have completed May Day with just 4- 5 days’ work remaining. I debuted with Rudra on the OTT platform and realised working for OTT platforms is the same. Filming on OTT takes a lesser number of days in comparison to films. Also, we have to up our sleeves in terms of filmmaking and its storytelling. If it’s not up to the mark, children also shun it within a minute and say, “Yeh kya bakwas hai.”

Whenever theatres open, even across the world, people will go to watch films.

Many stars are shifting to working on OTT now. What do you make of this shift?

What do actors want? They want to be seen to the maximum. So, with the advent of platforms, it strikes a good balance between theatres and OTT. We can show our work on both OTT and films. This will enable the filmmakers to show their work to people all over.

Besting Social Media

Many say social media has become the deciding factor for how well films fare depending on reviews. How do you look at it?

The deciding factor is the film ultimately. Regarding the meter gauge of the film on OTT, that is there, we don’t come to know exactly about it. But can make out knowing how well the film has been received and this helps you know about the success of the film. We cannot do anything as everyone has become the media by putting their own comments. The best part is to be away from it. I’m not much on Twitter or any other platform. I only use it whenever I feel like conveying something.

So how do you handle trolls?

Honestly, speaking on my phone, I am not operational on any social media platform be it Twitter or Instagram. The best way is not to keep updated. Whenever I wish to say something, I do go on it and write it on my social media platform. Most of the time we see cuss words written on it. There is no credibility about what is written. How do we know what is right and what is wrong? Only our trusted people’s judgment makes sense. Most of the time I remain disconnected.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Prince Cecil Decodes the Perks & Challenges of a Destination Wedding

Actor Prince Cecil married Sai Machiraju in an intimate, 80–100 guest wedding in New Zealand, her home country, on August 24. In an exclusive with Hashtag Magazine, he breaks down what nobody tells you about planning a wedding away from home. The Perks An intimate celebration: New Zealand as our destination wedding was special because my wife, Sai Machiraju, is from there. But the thing about destination weddings is you have to keep it very private, like close-knit. I think just 80-100 people attended our wedding. Core memories that last: Destination weddings create core memories that stay lifelong. Our post-wedding pics in the snow, flying down from a helicopter, were just two happy people who wanted to capture our love. The couple even shot part of their album at Cecil Peak, a nod to his name. It was pretty cold, but it felt like a Classic Bollywood moment; at least I was covered in a sherwani, and my wife was in a saree. The right team makes the difference: There are a lot of challenges in planning a destination wedding: admin for travel, tickets, food, stage, clothes, logistics. They were quite major, but having a great team, management and a limited crowd was a huge plus. The Challenges Not everyone can make it: Someone close wants to attend it badly, but life, work commitments and the distance meant they had to skip it. That’s one of the hardest parts, missing someone you desperately want there on your special day. You can’t control the weather: The night before their outdoor ceremony, it rained heavily. We were so tensed and worried about how we’d manage, and checking for last-minute backup options. Planning can get chaotic: Coordination outside your space, managing things as per our customs and rituals, is so hard. Everything was

RAMAYANA: THE EPIC REIMAGINED

Ramayana: The Epic Reimagined is shaping up to be one of Indian cinema’s most ambitious productions, bringing together a star-studded cast and an international creative team. From its two-part format and reported ₹4,000-crore budget to its cutting-edge visual effects and global release plans, here are 10 things to know about the epic cinematic spectacle. 1.Two films, one epic Ramayana is planned as a two-part cinematic project. The first instalment is scheduled for release during Diwali 2026, with the second chapter planned for Diwali 2027. The films are directed by Nitesh Tiwari and produced by Namit Malhotra. Ranbir Kapoor has revealed that the team shot around six hours of footage for the first film before editing it down. A Chinese listing reportedly indicates a runtime of about 166 minutes for Part One. 2.Ranbir Kapoor as Rama: The first choice Ranbir Kapoor plays Lord Rama, amid years of speculation over other names. Mahesh Babu, Hrithik Roshan and Ram Charan were among the actors linked to various versions of the project. However, director Nitesh Tiwari and producer Namit Malhotra have clarified that Ranbir was always their first choice for their current Ramayana. Tiwari cited his physicality, screen presence and ability to convey emotion through his expressions. Interestingly, Yash, who plays Ravana, was also reportedly considered for Rama before taking on the antagonist. 3.Sai Pallavi is Sita Sai Pallavi plays Sita opposite Ranbir Kapoor’s Rama. The role marks a major Hindi-film project for the acclaimed South Indian actor and adds another prominent South Indian star to the cast alongside Yash. 4.A large ensemble cast An extensive ensemble supports the three leads. Sunny Deol plays Hanuman, Ravi Dubey plays Lakshman, Arun Govil plays Dasharath, Lara Dutta plays Kaikeyi, Indira Krishnan plays Kausalya, Kajal Aggarwal plays Mandodari, Rakul Preet Singh plays Shurpanakha, Kunal Kapoor plays Indra

Exclusive Interview: Nikhil Siddhartha on Swayambhu, Family and Politics

After the pan-India success of Karthikeya 2, Nikhil Siddhartha finds himself at a pivotal phase in his career. The actor is currently gearing up for the release of Swayambhu, one of the most ambitious projects he has undertaken to date, a historical action drama that demanded nearly two-and-a-half years of dedication, extensive physical transformation, and months of post-production work. In a candid conversation with Priyanka Goud, Nikhil opens up about the challenges of mounting a large-scale period film, why he prioritises quality over quantity, how fatherhood has changed his outlook on life, and his belief in using cinema as a tool for social awareness. A Two-and-a-Half-Year Commitment Describing Swayambhu as a project unlike any other in his career, Nikhil revealed that he dedicated nearly two and a half years exclusively to the film.“Some films are easy to make, and some are difficult. Swayambhu falls into the category of films that demand complete commitment. I underwent a significant transformation for the role, growing my hair long, maintaining a specific physique, and immersing myself in the character and story throughout the production period,” he said. A Historical Story with Universal Appeal One of the aspects that attracted Nikhil to Swayambhu was its historical backdrop. Nikhil plays Krishnan Raman, a historical figure whose name appears on ancient copper plate inscriptions that have recently gained attention. “This story is rooted in history, but its themes are universal,” he said. “It’s not confined to one region; audiences across India will be able to connect with it.” The actor also highlighted the growing importance of visual effects in modern filmmaking. Swayambhu reportedly contains nearly 2,700 VFX shots, making post-production one of the most demanding phases of the project. “We completed principal photography in December 2025, but for the last five to six months it has been

Preity Zinta on Batwara 1947, Motherhood and Finding Her Way Back to Cinema

For Preity Zinta, returning to the screen with Batwara 1947 is about more than making a comeback. The period drama allowed her to explore a chapter of India’s history, work with director Rajkumar Santoshi for the first time, and step into a world far removed from her own. But the film also made her reflect on how much life has changed since she began her career, from the freedoms available to women today to the perspective that comes with becoming a mother. For Zinta, Batwara 1947 is ultimately a story about family, resilience and hope, as she tells Lipika Varma in an exclusive conversation. Why did you say yes to doing this film? What touched you the most? There were a couple of things. First, I really wanted to work with Raj ji. I had never worked with him before, so working with him was always on my bucket list. I had also always wanted to do a period film. Beyond that, I genuinely loved the story. What touched me most was that even in the darkest of times, there is always a ray of hope. People may see this as a story about two countries, but for me, it is essentially about a family. I was also deeply affected by stories of families who believed they were leaving their homes temporarily, even burying their jewellery and valuables, thinking they would return. They never imagined they would lose everything forever. Since this is my first period film, I spent time researching and understanding that era. After such a long break from films, why did you choose this project? I was enjoying my personal life, focusing on my family and raising my children. Professionally, I had always wanted to work with Raj ji and also wanted to do a period film.

You May Also Like

Connect with us