“It is genuinely impossible to be a star in multiple industries”: Dulquer Salmaan

“It is genuinely impossible to be a star in multiple industries” Dulquer Salmaan - Hashtag Magazine

Dulquer Salmaan’s film Chup-Revenge of the Artist, directed by R Balki is a highly anticipated romantic psycho-thriller that has been received well by the audiences.

When asked if this film was meant to silence critics, Dulquer says, “It’s not a critic-bashing film. It’s a story of an artist and his dynamics with the critics. It’s not a personal attack. When you watch the film you will see.”

The Industry-

Is it tough surviving in this competitive industry despite being a star son?

Being a star son comes with its advantages and disadvantages. But I feel a certain responsibility, I can’t be an actor making bad choices. My father [Mammootty], including others, sometimes signs films coming their way which might turn out to be a bad film. I am a second-generation actor. People will feel I’m a privileged kid, so I have to be responsible and never choose for money. So those responsibilities I put on myself, if I may not sign a great film but the intentions should be good. The perks of being a star kid are – It’s easy to register if I’m doing a Hindi film. I can be known as a so and so’s son. How long you survive, is entirely on you. When I wanted to become an actor my father said- I can hire anybody you want if you choose any business, but I can’t act for you. He allowed me to make my mistakes and he did not give me any advice. He behaves like my father, not as an actor, which has helped me become an actor.

Being a star son comes with its advantages and disadvantages. But I feel a certain responsibility, I can’t be an actor making bad choices.

You have completed ten years in the industry, how much have you evolved?

This journey has been the most beautiful. I take pride in my journey. I would be a journalist for my filmography. I loved the films I did. I got to do some amazing films/roles. Nothing was planned, each film opened doors to great films in all languages- Hindi, Tamil, and Malayalam. If you had told me ten years ago, I would not have believed it. I am happy to be promoting Director R. Balki’s, Chup.

What kind of appreciation and selection of roles did you choose from those offered by the Hindi film industry?

I kept getting offers and the two I liked were Chup and Guns and Gulaabs which will be on Netflix. I think whatever I do in Hindi is more interesting for me to be known as an actor, rather than a star. It is genuinely impossible to be a star in multiple industries. As actors, we build our work in one place. We can plan our releases and line up for the entire year. Delivering in one industry continuously you become a star. I cannot be doing this everywhere. The three languages down South can travel a lot easier because there are cultural similarities. But if I am doing films to become a star here in Hindi, I can’t forget people who have invested their time in Hindi films for so many years. I can’t be visiting and keep doing whatever work I do here. I would love to do good work and be in people’s minds. At times I take up bold choices and hope I am remembered for that.

It is genuinely impossible to be a star in multiple industries

Do you seek validation from critics?

No, I think I seek validation more from the audience. I do know there is a genuine amount of love, that they have for me as a person as they get to know me through my films. I genuinely seek their respect and love as an actor. I want to be known as an actor and a performer. I know what commercially people want to see me do, and those may be easier choices. Sometimes, I make tougher choices in my roles that scare me. I want to tell the audience I respect their time, so I want to be offering something worth quality and passion to them.

How do you take the comparison that you may have gotten from the South and now being in the Bollywood industry?

I’m very much secure as an actor. I am not as sensitive as I was before as I have been in the glitzy world for ten years and have done so many films I have matured. People believe in me and feel I’m serious about whatever I do and I’m here to stay. I don’t know how much it affects the film. People always want to watch what they want to watch. I feel it’s time for more responsible critiquing of cinema. Everybody with a handle on social media and a phone in their hand is a critic, but there is no method to that madness. A genuine critic has watched a lot of cinema all over the world. I also think if you love cinema you should give a certain amount of love and criticize it with a certain amount of kindness. Social media criticism is not coming from studying a lot in the subject matter, it’s just an opinion.

My father allowed me to make my mistakes and he did not give me any advice. He behaves like my father, not as an actor, which has helped me become an actor.

Tollywood fans hero-worship and contribute a lot to the rise and fall of the stars, if two actors team up together the fans favour one over the other. How do you look at this pulling down by the fans on social media?

Costume styling – Harmann Kaur @harmann_kaur_2.0
Hairstylist – Rohit Bhatkar @rohit_bhatkar
Make up – Ratheesh AV @av_ratheeshcinema
Photographer – Sudhanshu Sawate @psudo

Management – Vaishali Bhatia @vaishalib2907

I don’t want to comment on Tollywood because I work primarily in Telugu films as well. I think it’s the films that make us stars. It doesn’t mean that every film guarantees your success. Salman Khan is an exception. It’s like watching- the India-Pak match, you pick your sides. You support the actor you follow and hopefully if that actor is doing well your team is winning. And if your rival’s film is going up, you can get angry. It’s the same as the Indian cricket fans getting angry when the team performs badly. I see it as a sport. In Malayalam, there has been my father and Mohan Laal. There have been two divided sections. This is a part of our cultural fabric.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Prince Cecil Decodes the Perks & Challenges of a Destination Wedding

Actor Prince Cecil married Sai Machiraju in an intimate, 80–100 guest wedding in New Zealand, her home country, on August 24. In an exclusive with Hashtag Magazine, he breaks down what nobody tells you about planning a wedding away from home. The Perks An intimate celebration: New Zealand as our destination wedding was special because my wife, Sai Machiraju, is from there. But the thing about destination weddings is you have to keep it very private, like close-knit. I think just 80-100 people attended our wedding. Core memories that last: Destination weddings create core memories that stay lifelong. Our post-wedding pics in the snow, flying down from a helicopter, were just two happy people who wanted to capture our love. The couple even shot part of their album at Cecil Peak, a nod to his name. It was pretty cold, but it felt like a Classic Bollywood moment; at least I was covered in a sherwani, and my wife was in a saree. The right team makes the difference: There are a lot of challenges in planning a destination wedding: admin for travel, tickets, food, stage, clothes, logistics. They were quite major, but having a great team, management and a limited crowd was a huge plus. The Challenges Not everyone can make it: Someone close wants to attend it badly, but life, work commitments and the distance meant they had to skip it. That’s one of the hardest parts, missing someone you desperately want there on your special day. You can’t control the weather: The night before their outdoor ceremony, it rained heavily. We were so tensed and worried about how we’d manage, and checking for last-minute backup options. Planning can get chaotic: Coordination outside your space, managing things as per our customs and rituals, is so hard. Everything was

RAMAYANA: THE EPIC REIMAGINED

Ramayana: The Epic Reimagined is shaping up to be one of Indian cinema’s most ambitious productions, bringing together a star-studded cast and an international creative team. From its two-part format and reported ₹4,000-crore budget to its cutting-edge visual effects and global release plans, here are 10 things to know about the epic cinematic spectacle. 1.Two films, one epic Ramayana is planned as a two-part cinematic project. The first instalment is scheduled for release during Diwali 2026, with the second chapter planned for Diwali 2027. The films are directed by Nitesh Tiwari and produced by Namit Malhotra. Ranbir Kapoor has revealed that the team shot around six hours of footage for the first film before editing it down. A Chinese listing reportedly indicates a runtime of about 166 minutes for Part One. 2.Ranbir Kapoor as Rama: The first choice Ranbir Kapoor plays Lord Rama, amid years of speculation over other names. Mahesh Babu, Hrithik Roshan and Ram Charan were among the actors linked to various versions of the project. However, director Nitesh Tiwari and producer Namit Malhotra have clarified that Ranbir was always their first choice for their current Ramayana. Tiwari cited his physicality, screen presence and ability to convey emotion through his expressions. Interestingly, Yash, who plays Ravana, was also reportedly considered for Rama before taking on the antagonist. 3.Sai Pallavi is Sita Sai Pallavi plays Sita opposite Ranbir Kapoor’s Rama. The role marks a major Hindi-film project for the acclaimed South Indian actor and adds another prominent South Indian star to the cast alongside Yash. 4.A large ensemble cast An extensive ensemble supports the three leads. Sunny Deol plays Hanuman, Ravi Dubey plays Lakshman, Arun Govil plays Dasharath, Lara Dutta plays Kaikeyi, Indira Krishnan plays Kausalya, Kajal Aggarwal plays Mandodari, Rakul Preet Singh plays Shurpanakha, Kunal Kapoor plays Indra

Exclusive Interview: Nikhil Siddhartha on Swayambhu, Family and Politics

After the pan-India success of Karthikeya 2, Nikhil Siddhartha finds himself at a pivotal phase in his career. The actor is currently gearing up for the release of Swayambhu, one of the most ambitious projects he has undertaken to date, a historical action drama that demanded nearly two-and-a-half years of dedication, extensive physical transformation, and months of post-production work. In a candid conversation with Priyanka Goud, Nikhil opens up about the challenges of mounting a large-scale period film, why he prioritises quality over quantity, how fatherhood has changed his outlook on life, and his belief in using cinema as a tool for social awareness. A Two-and-a-Half-Year Commitment Describing Swayambhu as a project unlike any other in his career, Nikhil revealed that he dedicated nearly two and a half years exclusively to the film.“Some films are easy to make, and some are difficult. Swayambhu falls into the category of films that demand complete commitment. I underwent a significant transformation for the role, growing my hair long, maintaining a specific physique, and immersing myself in the character and story throughout the production period,” he said. A Historical Story with Universal Appeal One of the aspects that attracted Nikhil to Swayambhu was its historical backdrop. Nikhil plays Krishnan Raman, a historical figure whose name appears on ancient copper plate inscriptions that have recently gained attention. “This story is rooted in history, but its themes are universal,” he said. “It’s not confined to one region; audiences across India will be able to connect with it.” The actor also highlighted the growing importance of visual effects in modern filmmaking. Swayambhu reportedly contains nearly 2,700 VFX shots, making post-production one of the most demanding phases of the project. “We completed principal photography in December 2025, but for the last five to six months it has been

Preity Zinta on Batwara 1947, Motherhood and Finding Her Way Back to Cinema

For Preity Zinta, returning to the screen with Batwara 1947 is about more than making a comeback. The period drama allowed her to explore a chapter of India’s history, work with director Rajkumar Santoshi for the first time, and step into a world far removed from her own. But the film also made her reflect on how much life has changed since she began her career, from the freedoms available to women today to the perspective that comes with becoming a mother. For Zinta, Batwara 1947 is ultimately a story about family, resilience and hope, as she tells Lipika Varma in an exclusive conversation. Why did you say yes to doing this film? What touched you the most? There were a couple of things. First, I really wanted to work with Raj ji. I had never worked with him before, so working with him was always on my bucket list. I had also always wanted to do a period film. Beyond that, I genuinely loved the story. What touched me most was that even in the darkest of times, there is always a ray of hope. People may see this as a story about two countries, but for me, it is essentially about a family. I was also deeply affected by stories of families who believed they were leaving their homes temporarily, even burying their jewellery and valuables, thinking they would return. They never imagined they would lose everything forever. Since this is my first period film, I spent time researching and understanding that era. After such a long break from films, why did you choose this project? I was enjoying my personal life, focusing on my family and raising my children. Professionally, I had always wanted to work with Raj ji and also wanted to do a period film.

You May Also Like

Connect with us